RFR Owner Expectations
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at scrye.com
Wed Mar 16 22:36:56 UTC 2011
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:09:55 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2674
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/RFR_Responsibilities%28draft%29
>
> We're currently suffering under the weight of too many services and
> too few admins. Some of that is because the expectations of people
> submitting RFR's isn't well defined. Here's the start of a document
> to address that. You're welcome to brainstorm additions to that and
> later we can work at organization/making it better reading for people
> making an RFR.
>
> I've made it a meeting discussion item to gain visibility and more
> feedback, but there's no decisions to be made at this time. Just
> need to be fleshed out more.
Yeah, I think this is a good start.
I would say that it would make sense to fold it into the main RFR
doc and then add to it as we go.
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20110316/640db863/attachment.bin
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list