RFR Owner Expectations

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Wed Mar 16 22:36:56 UTC 2011


On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:09:55 -0700
Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> wrote:

> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2674
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/RFR_Responsibilities%28draft%29
> 
> We're currently suffering under the weight of too many services and
> too few admins.  Some of that is because the expectations of people
> submitting RFR's isn't well defined.  Here's the start of a document
> to address that.  You're welcome to brainstorm additions to that and
> later we can work at organization/making it better reading for people
> making an RFR.
> 
> I've made it a meeting discussion item to gain visibility and more
> feedback, but there's no decisions to be made at this time.  Just
> need to be fleshed out more.

Yeah, I think this is a good start. 

I would say that it would make sense to fold it into the main RFR
doc and then add to it as we go. 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20110316/640db863/attachment.bin 


More information about the infrastructure mailing list