infrastructure Digest, Vol 71, Issue 17

Sat Apr 14 13:42:10 UTC 2012

All are fine.

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:00 AM, <
infrastructure-request at lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Send infrastructure mailing list submissions to
>        infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        infrastructure-request at lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        infrastructure-owner at lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of infrastructure digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. meeting times (Kevin Fenzi)
>   2. Re: meeting times (Pierre-Yves Chibon)
>   3. Re: meeting times (Toshio Kuratomi)
>   4. Re: meeting times (seth vidal)
>   5. Re: meeting times (Adrian Hannah)
>   6. Re: meeting times (Ricky Elrod)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:45:58 -0600
> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com>
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: meeting times
> Message-ID: <20120413094558.08951d56 at jelerak.scrye.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Greetings.
>
> We moved the meeting time to 20UTC a while back to leave time for folks
> with other meetings that were taking place earlier. I think some of
> these meetings no longer meet then, so...
>
> Should we move to 18UTC?
> Should we move to 19UTC?
> Should we just stay at 20UTC?
>
> Or some other time? :)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> kevin
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 836 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120413/8e53d160/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:53:01 +0200
> From: Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr>
> To: infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: meeting times
> Message-ID: <1334332381.13858.5.camel at ambre.pingoured.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 09:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > We moved the meeting time to 20UTC a while back to leave time for folks
> > with other meetings that were taking place earlier. I think some of
> > these meetings no longer meet then, so...
> >
> > Should we move to 18UTC?
> > Should we move to 19UTC?
> > Should we just stay at 20UTC?
>
> The first two options would be nicer for me (with a slight preference
> for the first one), but I don't know if we are so many in my time zone.
>
> Pierre
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:07:46 -0700
> From: Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: meeting times
> Message-ID: <20120413170746.GE11151 at unaka.lan>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:53:01PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 09:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > Greetings.
> > >
> > > We moved the meeting time to 20UTC a while back to leave time for folks
> > > with other meetings that were taking place earlier. I think some of
> > > these meetings no longer meet then, so...
> > >
> > > Should we move to 18UTC?
> > > Should we move to 19UTC?
> > > Should we just stay at 20UTC?
> >
> > The first two options would be nicer for me (with a slight preference
> > for the first one), but I don't know if we are so many in my time zone.
> >
> I can do any of thoe times.
>
> -Toshio
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 198 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120413/17ab4432/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:38:14 -0400
> From: seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org>
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: meeting times
> Message-ID: <20120413163814.614f9df5 at opus>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:45:58 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>
> > Greetings.
> >
> > We moved the meeting time to 20UTC a while back to leave time for
> > folks with other meetings that were taking place earlier. I think
> > some of these meetings no longer meet then, so...
> >
> > Should we move to 18UTC?
> > Should we move to 19UTC?
> > Should we just stay at 20UTC?
> >
> > Or some other time? :)
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > kevin
>
>
> 19UTC or 18UTC is preferred for me.
>
> -sv
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 190 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120413/53ecdb9b/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:53:36 -0500
> From: Adrian Hannah <adrian at adrianhannah.net>
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: meeting times
> Message-ID: <9D2666F0-CA30-466F-B8B4-00C2FAC6E13A at adrianhannah.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii
>
> Same for me
>
> Adrian Hannah
> http://about.me/adrianhannah
>
> On Apr 13, 2012, at 15:38, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:45:58 -0600
> > Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Greetings.
> >>
> >> We moved the meeting time to 20UTC a while back to leave time for
> >> folks with other meetings that were taking place earlier. I think
> >> some of these meetings no longer meet then, so...
> >>
> >> Should we move to 18UTC?
> >> Should we move to 19UTC?
> >> Should we just stay at 20UTC?
> >>
> >> Or some other time? :)
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> kevin
> >
> >
> > 19UTC or 18UTC is preferred for me.
> >
> > -sv
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:48:04 -0400
> From: Ricky Elrod <codeblock at fedoraproject.org>
> To: infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: meeting times
> Message-ID: <4F88C944.30302 at fedoraproject.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On 04/13/2012 04:38 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > 19UTC or 18UTC is preferred for me.
> >
> > -sv
> >
>
> What he said. :)
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 490 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120413/19889503/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
> End of infrastructure Digest, Vol 71, Issue 17
> **********************************************
>

-- 
Jeffrey Haemer <jeffrey.haemer at gmail.com>
720-837-8908 [cell], http://seejeffrun.blogspot.com [blog],
http://www.youtube.com/user/goyishekop [vlog]
*פרייהייט? דאס איז יאַנג דינען וואָרט.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120414/304b4d1e/attachment.html>