new web app urls discussion

seth vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Mon Feb 6 19:57:57 UTC 2012


On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:53:09 -0700
Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> 
> http://tagger.fedoraproject.org/ 
> and
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger/
> and
> https://tagger.fedoraproject.org
> go to the tagger application. 
> 
> This means that we can't share signin on tagger, unless we move our
> other applications that have login cookies under
> apps.fedoraproject.org and make that the preferred url right?
> 
> Since we have that under admin. Should we instead put tagger: 
> 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/tagger/ 
> 
> At least for now until we move other applications that use admin?
> 


I would suggest NOT using admin.

1. the name is utterly confusing to users. Admin.fp.o/blah  screams "GO
AWAY THIS IS FOR NOT YOU" to me
2. Even if the user has to login separately, so be it. It's less
intimidating to let the app be simple to see.



I'd rather move toward apps.* and start with tagger, personally.

-sv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120206/f6821fed/attachment.sig>


More information about the infrastructure mailing list