Mirror Issue

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:02:52 -0800
Robyn Bergeron <rbergero at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
> 
> Thanks for the note, much appreciated. :)
> 
> I've copied the infrastructure team on this mail - hopefully they can 
> help out with this issue.  I'm also curious about the issue with
> Gnome Updater Tool - is infra aware of this as a known issue?

I've mailed the admin of this mirror to ask them to look into things. 

I'm not aware of this PackageKit issue. Could someone perhaps file a
bug on it and we can see about getting more attention on it?

> Cheers!
> 
> -Robyn

kevin
--
> On 03/05/2012 05:30 AM, John Mellor wrote:
> > Hi Robyn,
> >
> > I'm not sure who is supposed to be managing the mirror table or the
> > state of the mirrors, as there don't appear to be any docs on this
> > important part of the Fedora infrastructure online.  Can you pass
> > this on to whomever is in charge of deciding the mirror sites?
> >
> > We need to get someone to either investigate why a particular pair
> > of Fedora mirror sites have stopped mirroring.  The following has
> > been going on for weeks now, for all updates:
> >
> > http://fedora.mirror.nexicom.net/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm:
> > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found :
> > http://fedora.mirror.nexicom.net/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
> > Trying other mirror.
> > ftp://mirror.nexicom.net/pub/fedora/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm:
> > [Errno 14] FTP Error 550 :
> > ftp://mirror.nexicom.net/pub/fedora/linux/updates/16/x86_64/squid-3.2.0.15-1.fc16.x86_64.rpm
> > Trying other mirror.
> >
> > Its not fatal for non-gui command-line users, as the next mirror in
> > the list is behaving properly and yum does the right thing, but its
> > deadly for the graphical Gnome Updater Tool (which does not seem to
> > use fallback sites [possible bug], and simply fails).  The end
> > result is that people who use the graphical update tools have been
> > seeing no security and other updates for weeks now, which is pretty
> > dangerous.
> >
> > If Nexicom has just broken their refresh mechanism temporarily, can
> > we give them a heads-up about the problem?  If they are now broken
> > permanently, can we get it removed from the list?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John Mellor
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120305/e9ff76df/attachment.sig>