Some questions around coprs

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Dec 5 12:46:36 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/04/2013 04:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 4 December 2013 13:20, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com 
> <mailto:kevin at scrye.com>> wrote:
> 
> So, at todays fesco meeting there was some discussion about coprs. 
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meetbot/fedora-meeting/2013-12-04/fesco.2013-12-04-17.59.log.html#l-52
>
> 
> 
> And then you run into the politics of who gets shipped and who
> doesn't and if you don't ship all of them then how do you add new
> ones that get added and ones that go away..  Too much cart, too
> little horse.
> 


As discussed at the FESCo meeting, this should be entirely up to
FESCo. My proposal would be that COPR repository owners would petition
FESCo (via a ticket), it would get voted on or we'd come back and tell
them what changes they'd need to make before it would be accepted
(e.g. "Please don't downgrade glibc", etc.)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlKgdawACgkQeiVVYja6o6OygQCfZCxV7xfrDzU/4A4ku1YdeqQ8
3BUAnjUV0v7ZOo+VSJvujmf3q7nwbqUo
=X9Tu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the infrastructure mailing list