Some questions around coprs
Stephen Gallagher
sgallagh at redhat.com
Thu Dec 5 12:46:36 UTC 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/04/2013 04:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4 December 2013 13:20, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com
> <mailto:kevin at scrye.com>> wrote:
>
> So, at todays fesco meeting there was some discussion about coprs.
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meetbot/fedora-meeting/2013-12-04/fesco.2013-12-04-17.59.log.html#l-52
>
>
>
> And then you run into the politics of who gets shipped and who
> doesn't and if you don't ship all of them then how do you add new
> ones that get added and ones that go away.. Too much cart, too
> little horse.
>
As discussed at the FESCo meeting, this should be entirely up to
FESCo. My proposal would be that COPR repository owners would petition
FESCo (via a ticket), it would get voted on or we'd come back and tell
them what changes they'd need to make before it would be accepted
(e.g. "Please don't downgrade glibc", etc.)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlKgdawACgkQeiVVYja6o6OygQCfZCxV7xfrDzU/4A4ku1YdeqQ8
3BUAnjUV0v7ZOo+VSJvujmf3q7nwbqUo
=X9Tu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list