Fedocal to prod?
Ralph Bean
rbean at redhat.com
Tue Feb 12 23:34:31 UTC 2013
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:15:42PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 13:00 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:42:56 +0100
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I am getting some pressure to move fedocal to production (which is
> > > pretty nice).
Good! :)
> > I think admin.fedoraproject.org/calendar or perhaps
> > apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar would be fine.
>
> hm, since it needs login shouldn't it be admin?
I'm not sure what the original reason for the distinction was, but fyi
apps.fedoraproject.org/tagger requires login.
If it's just an aesthetic choice, I prefer the apps.fp.o/calendar one.
Either way, I can add this to the apps.fp.o/ landing page when its
ready.
-Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130212/c4246c6c/attachment.sig>
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list