Bug in unretiring a package?

[Patrick Uiterwijk]

Hi Michael,

It might make sense to wait for the rel-eng answer, as they have not yet
responded to the ticket that's being referenced to.

Regards,
Patrick Uiterwijk


On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello!
>
> We may have hit a bug during an attempt at unretiring "libmetalink".
> There is no "Take ownership" button. For "devel" it is still marked
> as "orphan" and "deprecated":
>
>   pkgdb ownership page:
>   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libmetalink
>
>   Re-review ticket:
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/962834
>
> What is missing? The initial SCM admin request has not been for "master",
> but there has been a second request.
>
>   "Claiming Ownership of a Deprecated Package" instructions:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Michael Schwendt
> Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.5-301.fc19.x86_64
> loadavg: 0.13 0.12 0.09
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130617/6e18bf7b/attachment.html>