Bug in unretiring a package?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:03:38 +0200
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:15:24 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:08:42 +0200, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote:
> > 
> > > It might make sense to wait for the rel-eng answer, as they have
> > > not yet responded to the ticket that's being referenced to.
> > 
> > Does that mean steps 5 and 6 on this page should be reversed?
> > 
> >   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package
> > 
> > I've thought unblocking (in koji) and ownership in pkgdb are
> > separate from eachother.
> 
> A reoccuring problem, it seems:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890769#c20
> 
> The entire Wiki page does nowhere refer to the branch name for
> "the current release". Some have tried "f20", others "master",
> Jon Ciesla refers to "devel".
> 
> Clarification much appreciated

My understanding is that the scm admin is the one to undepreciate a
package thats coming back into the collection from being retired. I can
clarify with Jon. 

I've done it for this package. 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130617/95105455/attachment.sig>