sslonly and stg

[Patrick Uiterwijk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 02:43:57PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, this would apply to everywhere... production as well. 
I see, but still 301 would be cached too long if we'd change it later on (301 might cache forever in a browser, after all it means "permanently moved").
> 
> I don't much care if we do 302 tho. Any other thoughts?
Yes, you might make the RewriteCond a bit easier by replacing it with RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off.
> 
> kevin

Patrick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=7TGL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----