GitLab proposal wiki page

[Mrigesh Pokhrel]

Hi Kevin,
    I am as interested in this project as I was before, the changing of
Title isnt an issue . What I am worried about is my proposal does not fit
with the current idea. So I was asking the mentor for this project if I am
allowed to modify it. I mailed bckurera and he said he has no problem as
long as the mentor is ready with it. I have read about the packaging and am
talking on ML about RFR and same. I have a proposal ready to resubmit on
fedora wiki. Just waiting if I am allowed to do so.

Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel


On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 5 May 2013 11:21:53 +0530
> Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >    So, The GitLab hosting project has been scrubbed and replaced with
> > packaging. What about the GSOC submission?
>
> The "idea" for it has been around for years, but it was simply carried
> over from previous years. We recently looked more closely at it and
> decided that it wouldn't really be a great fit until they added more
> public repo ability. In any case it would need to be packaged before we
> can use it in Fedora Infrastructure and doing so is probibly already
> more than a GSoC worth of work. ;(
>
> > Anyways , the change is
> > not the issue. A few days back Vit sent me links about
> > packaging[1][2], I have already started on it .
>
> Note that there are at least 2 other people interested in this as well.
>
> > But then still , how
> > would the change in project idea affect my evaluation , as I
> > understand it changes the whole proposal idea so should I change my
> > proposal accordingly and am I allowed to do so now?
>
> I don't know what the deadlines or process is there.
>
> Sorry for changing the ideas page so late, but I wanted to make it
> reflect more reality. :(
>
> kevin
> --
> >
> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
> > [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 4 May 2013 23:59:41 +0530
> > > Mrigesh Pokhrel <mrigeshpokhrel at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >     I have made my Proposal wiki page[1] for your reference , do
> > > > comment and review it and help me in improving it as required.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013/Student_Application_rag3nix/Gitlib
> > > >
> > > > IRC : rag3nix , rag3
> > >
> > > So, this idea has changed a lot since it was on the idea page.
> > >
> > > Basically the current thing that needs doing is packaging gitlab and
> > > all it's vast dependencies into Fedora/EPEL. This will allow anyone
> > > interested in running it to simply yum install it and go, which
> > > will be great. :)
> > >
> > > This would allow us down the road to deploy one in Fedora
> > > Infrastructure if it meets our needs. (and it would use the normal
> > > RFR process at:
> > >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Request_For_Resources?rd=Infrastructure/RFR
> > > )
> > > See discussion on the infrastructure list about how gitlab may or
> > > may not meet our needs (mostly around how they handle public repos).
> > > Additionally, if we do decide to setup gitlab, I think it very
> > > likely we would NOT move all our hosted projects to it, but instead
> > > allow it as a opt-in or additional resource (possibly even allowing
> > > anyone with a fedora account to just make their own projects there).
> > >
> > > So, I would suggest you re-work your proposal as packging it up (or
> > > choose another one if you are not interested in packaging).
> > >
> > > I've reworked the suggestions page:
> > >
> > >
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Summer_coding_ideas_for_2013&diff=prev&oldid=335470
> > > to better reflect this.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the confusion.
> > >
> > > kevin
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Thanks and Regards
Mrigesh Pokhrel
+91 9807585021
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130505/d9474856/attachment.html>