Freeze Break Request - Fedora Tagger

Ralph Bean rbean at redhat.com
Wed May 15 21:00:33 UTC 2013


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 01:35:42PM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Since tagger is now part of the compose process we probably want to start
> doing only small, targeted changes.
> 
> however, this is only the second day of beta freeze (not final).  I've
> reviewed the first four changes and they seem okay.  The last one is larger
> and more complex.  All have already had signoff to merge into the upstream
> repo.
> 
> These are all UI changes, so at worst people wouldn't be able to add and
> edit tags; it shouldn't affect the ability for tags to be pulled out of
> tagger for use in the compose process.
> 
> So I think updating ASAP would be okay but we should still try not to do
> this in the future.
> 
> -Toshio

Adding further comment: the change is 'high impact' in the sense that it
touches tagger which is now part of the compose process.  It is 'low
impact' in that it is mostly superficial UI changes.

It is also low-urgency.  It doesn't *need* to go in during the freeze.
It can wait until after.

I just made the announcement the other day and got an avalanche of bug
reports -- this knocks off the low hanging fruit.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20130515/e45cb20e/attachment.sig>


More information about the infrastructure mailing list