Atomic status

[Joe Brockmeier]

On 07/18/2014 10:35 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> But the thing I'm really increasingly questioning is whether that
> Fedora-branded endgame is right.

I think so? In part, I would hope Fedora Atomic would also bring more
folks in to use Fedora *in* containers running on Atomic.

Also - the plan originally for Project Atomic was explicitly not to
develop a distribution ourselves, but help develop the tools/patterns,
etc. for Fedora, CentOS, RHEL, and potentially others to create Atomic
hosts. Long-term, would a Remix be too close to Atomic creating its own
distribution?

> If it is right, why are RDO and oVirt separate?

I'm probably not the right person to answer that. Are those models more
desirable than Atomic being part of the Cloud product?

Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb at redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20140718/0e5c8393/attachment-0001.sig>