Fedora Hosted Project Guidelines (Ticket #847)

[jtroan at jt-sw.com]

> I've been thinking about a few ways we can clean up fedorahosted.org
> and, after talking with Kevin, I think I've got a good enough draft
> to let you guys give any input you might have. I've pasted the draft at
> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/98687/
>
> Drop your ideas in here and we'll add them to the list as we go. I'm
> also in #fedora-admin and #fedora-noc as bwood09. Thanks for your
> help! Hopefully we can have this hammered out quickly!
>

I looked over the document and nothing jumped up & down, begging for
editing.

<Two cents from a newbie>

I think another condition for a "review" flag is missing / incomplete
documentation.  With solid documentation being a co-goal of the effort, I
think it would help to build a list of projects needing more written up --
no matter how ugly-long it gets.  Even if the project passes the review
with flying colors, it could simply shift to a "needs documentation" list
that can be worked from over time.

(I've had to write a lot of stuff in the past, and am starting to get
involved in more documentation with some recently-new job duties.  I think
having a To Do list will help direct where efforts should be concentrated /
prioritized.)

</Two cents from a newbie>

=======================================================================
John M. Troan  <jtroan at jt-sw.com>
Maintainer: Football Site @ JT-SW.com
  http://www.jt-sw.com/football
Chief of Computer Operations
  U.S.S. Kitty Hawk / NCC-1659
=======================================================================