FAS3/MM2 FAD

[Dennis Gilmore]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:21:21 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:20:06PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:39:50AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:37:44AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > > wrote:
> > > > TODO:
> > > > * Confirm location and dates with Matt
> > > > * Confirm location and dates with Toshio
> > > >   -> I will email them
> > > 
> > > Matt confirmed that he is planning on attending and will make his
> > > own travel arrangements.
> > > 
> > > Toshio isn't sure yet, should get back to me on this on Friday.
> > > 
> > > If neither Toshio nor Xavier can make it, should we make the FAD
> > > a little shorter and focused on MirrorManager2 only?
> > 
> > This is a possibility.  It might also be possible to have a "Plan B"
> > application if the right people are present.  Preferably this would
> > be something on the Fedora.next critical path, so we get maximum
> > value from the FAD event.
> 
> Potential plan B:
> - hackfest on the ansible migration
> - hackfest on the el7 migration
> - hackfest on atomic's infrastructure?
> - ?
> 
> > I wanted to raise two additional issues:
> > 
> > (1) A budget is needed for this event very soon if the event will
> > happen December 4-9.  It's less than two months away, and flight
> > costs are likely to rise imminently.  The attendance roster and
> > costs need to be finalized so the budget can be established and
> > approved.
> 
> Unless we replace some people in the current budget with others (with
> different travel costs), we have probably an "upper limit" budget,
> which could only go down if less people come or if we make it shorter.
> 
> > (2) I'm not sure this timeframe will work well for Fedora release
> > engineering.  There is a release scheduled for December 2, and
> > whether there's any further slip in the F21 release schedule,
> > travel around this event would raise unnecessary challenges with
> > the release.  How vital is a rel-eng representative for
> > MirrorManager hacking?
> 
> I had added Dennis to the list of potential attendee because he
> mentionned once to me wanted to the involved in the design of how
> FAS3 generates the certs used to upload to the dist-git.
> But if the FAS part does not happen, then I don't think there is much
> interest for him to be involved in the MirrorManager part.
> Dennis comes back to the US on Dec 2nd, so technically he would be
> able to make it but that would be up to him.
I am returning to the US on December 3rd not second I also am not in
Chicago.

Dennis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=eCeH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----