Freeze Break Request: add db for execdb-stg to db-qa01.qa

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 10:06:19AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:37:50 -0600
> Tim Flink <tflink at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:16:27 +0200
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:47:43AM -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > > We had intended to do this before freeze but managed to miss it.
> > > > One of the upcoming features for taskotron that we've deployed to
> > > > dev and want to deploy to staging is execdb - task execution
> > > > tracking for Taskotron.
> > > > 
> > > > This requires adding a database to db-qa01.qa which is the db host
> > > > for the production Taskotron instance but no other changes to
> > > > production or frozen systems.
> > >  
> > > So you want a stg application to run against a db located on a
> > > production environment?
> > 
> > That's how it's been setup since we first deployed Taskotron - all the
> > dev, stg and prod dbs are on the same host.
> 
> Right. We can split them out later, but I didn't want 3 more
> instances running so super tiny db's would be seperate. 
> 
> > > Wouldn't it be more logical to have a db-qa01.qa.stg or so?
> > 
> > I can see the argument for doing that but I'm not sure that separating
> > them out would provide enough benefit to justify the overhead of (an)
> > additional database host(s) since the Taskotron bits don't really hit
> > the db very hard. I'm not against the idea of having separate db
> > servers for prod and dev/stg but I'd rather not muck around with that
> > during freeze.
> 
> Right. I didn't think these very small databases justified new
> sperate hosts. 

Ok wfm then :)
I was just surprise to see a different setup from what I'm used to. But that is
also possible because of the connection are allowed between stg and prod on the
qa network, right?


Pierre
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20150401/f03dc333/attachment-0001.sig>