Potential freeze-break for pkgdb2

Ralph Bean rbean at redhat.com
Tue Apr 7 15:21:12 UTC 2015


On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 08:35:51AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:10:07 +0200
> Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou at pingoured.fr> wrote:
> 
> > Good morning everyone!
> > 
> > I have a pull-request pending on pkgdb2 [1] for which I am wondering
> > if it is worth a freeze-break.
> 
> ...snip...
> 
> > What do people think? Worth a freeze break? (If so could I have +1 as
> > well?)
> 
> Sure, we could... +1. 
> 
> However, I wonder if we shouldn't change that it cc's to me and you...
> perhaps it should go to a role/group? admin@ or something? 

Agreed.  +1 as is, but it would be nice to set the NOTIFYEMAIL config
value to some sysadmin group in the future.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20150407/d8276a80/attachment.sig>


More information about the infrastructure mailing list