Fedora Cloud questions and proposal

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:56:26 +0200
Miroslav Suchý <msuchy at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 04/10/2015 06:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I think it might be a good idea to have some swift space setup, but
> > I am not sure what use cases we fully have for it, so I would say it
> > should be somewhat small. 100GB or something? 
> > This would also be backed by the equalogics? Or would it be
> > distributed on the nodes?
> 
> Swift have built-in split/replica mechanism. So I think that with
> this size, I can steal some space from vg_server of nodes.

Yeah. Or perhaps somewhat bigger would make sense? 500G? 

> > Are there specific cases where live migrations would help us out a
> > lot?
> 
> I do not know. Cold migration last several minutes. I agree that we
> can afford it. We are not bank or stock operator where every outage
> cost pile of money.

Yeah. The one place I thought might be nice was if we wanted to reboot
a compute node to update it, but then I got to thinking, why shouldn't
we also just reboot the instances too and update them as well? ;) 

kevin


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20150413/ba83c4d3/attachment.sig>