Upstream for dist-git [RFC]

[Miroslav Suchy]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/17/2015 05:01 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> All the work in the ansible repo should be covered under the FPCA,
> so without any explicit license I would think it would be MIT. We
> could see about getting a list of folks who worked on it and
> getting them to put it under GPLv2+ if you like. Or we could just
> stay with MIT?

Any free license is fine. MIT is fine as well.

Mirek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Ty9E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----