Jenkins migration to the new cloud

Michal Srb msrb at
Fri Jun 26 09:44:15 UTC 2015

On 06/26/2015 10:18 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:45:10PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> As briefly discussed today during the meeting, I would like to evaluate
>> the possibility to use our packaged Jenkins in Fedora infrastructure,
>> instead of upstream binaries. (Jenkins is available[1] in Fedora 21 and
>> later.)
>> To get started with development of new Jenkins machines I would need
>> someone to create 2 new cloud machines: master with Fedora 22 and with
>> any OS (RHEL 6 would be my choice), each machine with at least 1 CPU, 2
>> GB RAM, public IP and root access for me (FAS: mizdebsk).
>>  From that I will try to come with my proof-of-concept of "the new
>> Jenkins". If people like it then old data can be migrated and it can
>> become the new production instance. If not we can just scratch these
>> machines and keep using upstream binaries.
>> So if you don't mind I'd start working on this.
>> Should I open a ticket for creating the new cloud instances?
>> Some more technical notes:
>> 1) It is possible to use third-party plugins with packaged Jenkins,
>> which means that missing plugins can be installed as binary blobs until
>> they are packaged in Fedora.
>> 2) Jenkins RPMs must be installed only on master node. All slave nodes
>> can connect to master and download Jenkins code from there. Slaves still
>> need to have basic environment installed (such as Java, git, mock), but
>> not Jenkins itself. This means that only the master node must be Fedora
>> 21+, slaves can be anything (RHEL 6/7, older Fedoras).
>> 3) Michal Srb is currently looking into packaging Jenkins as software
>> collection for RHEL 6 and 7. Once (and if) done this could allow having
>> RHEL 7 master, with the disadvantage of using "unofficial" RPMs from
>> This is just the beginning and we can evaluate
>> having non-Fedora master later, if needed.
>> [1]
> This sounds all quite nice, thanks for picking it up!
> Just a side question, if we were to use an EL for the master node, is there
> an advantage of using SCLs over using upstream's repo as we do now?

All the dependencies in SCL will be built from sources. I basically plan 
to take spec files from Fedora, SCL-ize them (hopefully automatically), 
build them in Copr and then make the SCL available via [1]. Upstream 
releases new RPM literally every week. It basically contains what's 
currently in master branch in git. Stability is usually not bad, but it 
may vary. Then there are LTS releases. These receive updates for ~3 
months. Jenkins in SCL would receive security updates even after this 



> Otherwise, +1 on the Fedora master and let me know if I can help.
> We would probably have to re-adjust the jenkins playbook, likely in something
> like: roles/jenkins/{master,slaves} instead of the big blob we currently have.
> Pierre
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at

More information about the infrastructure mailing list