Preferred database / SQL variant for infra?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, 16 May 2015 18:29:24 +0200
Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.com.au> wrote:

> Is there also any aversion to any abstraction layers such as unixODBC
> in particular or that is acceptable if an application doesn't have
> direct PostgreSQL client code?

Yes postgres. The only two things we have left that use mysql/mariadb
are paste and wiki and we are migrating the wiki away soon. ;) 
(Of course qa has some mariadb so we won't be done with it, but at
least we will be somewhat reduced). 

Most of our applications use sqlalchemy and alembec. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20150518/c02422ec/attachment.sig>