My proposal for voing and such

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Sun Jan 22 01:04:49 UTC 2012


On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:08:04 +0000
Dave Riches <david.r at ultracar.co.uk> wrote:

> On 01/21/2012 07:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > ok, here's my proposal, feel free to pick it apart, or use it as the
> > basis for your own different proposal. ;)
> >
> > a) The sig controls/manages the following channels:
> >
> > #fedora
> > #fedora-social
> > #fedora-unregistered
> > #fedora-ops
> +1
> >
> > b) Voting members are everyone who's an op in any of the managed
> > channels.
> Without trying to be pedantic....this does slightly trigger the issue
> of how does an op expire? I am +o on some of those channels right
> now...if I disappear for a few years and return....does my status as
> op, and indeed voting rights remain? If not, how do we handle this
> (perhaps the expiration of op/definition of active op should be the
> subject of a different thread?)

It's handed via the removal section below. If someone decides you
haven't been around for a while and should be removed, they can propose
it. :) 

> I'm cool with this, provided that once we (the sig) have assumed
> control of the channel wrt operators...the sig is then responsible
> for appointing/removing operators as per the procedure indicated
> above. Making the assumption that this is correct, +1

Yep. That was the idea. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/irc-support-sig/attachments/20120121/74154022/attachment.sig>


More information about the irc-support-sig mailing list