voting proposal mark 2

[dr johnson]

I should add after reading the mtg notes:

None of this relates to #fedora-ops +V membership, nor FAS group membership.

This works nicely for chanserv perms though imho.

 -dj



On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM, dr johnson <fenris02 at fedoraproject.org>wrote:

> works for me.
>
> going by this, we could start adding / removing ops now-ish.  (in the
> past, we have had problems adding ops due to "too many members already").
>
>  -dj
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>
>> Bob and some others raised some concerns around the logistics of adding
>> and removing new channels...so, to simplify, here's a new version of my
>> voting proposal:
>>
>> a) The sig controls/manages the following channels:
>>
>> #fedora
>> #fedora-social
>> #fedora-unregistered
>> #fedora-ops
>>
>> b) Voting members are everyone who's an op in any of the managed
>> channels.
>>
>> c) New operators/voting members are nominated by any existing member,
>> who (after confirming the nominee is agreeable) files a ticket. Voting
>> members have 7 days to vote, majority vote determines outcome.
>>
>> d) Existing voting members can be removed in roughly the same way as
>> the process in c). Inactive members can be removed if their is a
>> majority vote to do so here.
>>
>> e) In other cases (aside from promoting/removing members),
>> broad consensus should be attempted first and if no clear consensus can
>> be reached a vote can be held on the issue or change.
>>
>> f) when and if other channels wish to join the sig, rules for that can
>> be added.
>>
>> kevin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> irc-support-sig mailing list
>> irc-support-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/irc-support-sig
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/irc-support-sig/attachments/20120126/db5f65c0/attachment.html>