[fedora-java] Should java-1.4.2-gcj-compat require xerces-j2?

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 09:45 -0400, David Walluck wrote:
> Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> wrote:
> 
> > It's very possible the ldap is only there for compliance with some spec,
> > and tomcat code has no use for it.
> 
> I mean, ldapjdk does not provide javax.naming.*, and I don't think that the
> jndi-ldap virtual package was meant for service providers (or was it?), in
> which case java-gcj-compat should provide jndi-ldap since it has
> javax.naming.*.
> 
> And tomcat5 does require those classes to build.

javax.naming.* and subpackages should be provided by libgcj/classpath.
We were up to date till at least 1.3, but maybe some newer classes are
missing. Could you post any compile errors and/or post a bug report
containing these to http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/bugs.html

Thanks,

Mark
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/attachments/20050806/0175d658/attachment.bin