[fedora-java] recommendations for coexistence with Sun-jre

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le dimanche 19 juin 2005 à 08:28 -0500, Justin Conover a écrit :
> On 6/17/05, Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 13:45 -0400, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > > Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> > >
> > > >On 6/17/05, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:54 -0400, Zlatin Balevsky wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>Is there an officially supported/recommended way of having Sun java
> > > >>>coexist with the -compat?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>Yes, we recommend creating a Sun JPackage RPM, then installing that.
> > > >>All the java tools in /usr/bin will then point to Sun's Java
> > > >>implementation.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >And in case you're unfamiliar with JPackage, that's easy to do; a quick
> > > >paraphrase of http://jpackage.org/rebuilding.php:
> > > >
> > > >1. Download and install the nosrc rpm http://jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=2546
> > > >
> > > >2. Put the Sun package in your rpmbuild/SOURCES
> > > >
> > > >3. rpmbuild -ba rpmbuild/SPECS/java....spec
> > > >
> > > >4. enjoy your RPMs in rpmbuild/RPMS/
> > > >
> > > >5. Add your name and a comments to
> > > >http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4680244.html
> > > >to get Sun to produce reasonable RPMs in the first place!
> 
> Trying to build this with FC4 X86_64 I get the following error.
> 
> + grep -vF alsa.so
> + grep -v jre/lib/security
> + grep -v Jdbc
> + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
> ERROR: file '/usr/share/java-1.5.0-sun/demo/jvmti/heapTracker/lib/libheapTracker_g.so'
> contains an invalid rpath '$ORIGIN/../../../../lib/amd64' in

Probably a problem rpm version. rpm seems decided to break jvm specfiles
every few releases. File a rpm bug in FC bugzilla and try another rpm
version - since the binaries are prebuild it should not change the
result.

Alternatively this might be a real spec bug but please check with rpm
gurus beforehand - I've lost count of the spurious build failures we've
had. rpm is just not real tested with nosrc.rpm - as it should.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/attachments/20050621/13278202/attachment.bin