[fedora-java] eclipse-platform -> javadoc

[Orion Poplawski]

Andrew Overholt wrote:
> * Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> [2006-04-11 12:34]:
>> Is the requirement of javadoc for eclipse-platform really necessary? 
>> javadoc is huge!
> 
> What do you mean?  You mean you don't want the docs as part of the
> platform?  This is part of the classic debate about whether we split
> packages into super-small pieces or keep them relatively close to their
> upstream downloadable counterparts.  I've tended to favour the latter but
> I'm not married to that way of doing things.
> 
> /usr/share/javadoc isn't relevant here.
> 
> Andrew

Well, it is, but I suppose not directly:

[root at cynosure ~]# du -sh /usr/share/javadoc/java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0
235M    /usr/share/javadoc/java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0
[root at cynosure ~]# rpm -e java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-javadoc
error: Failed dependencies:
         java-javadoc is needed by (installed) 
eclipse-platform-3.1.2-1jpp_13fc.i386
[root at cynosure ~]# rpm -e eclipse-platform
error: Failed dependencies:
         eclipse-platform is needed by (installed) 
eclipse-cdt-3.0.2-1jpp_2fc.i386
         eclipse-platform >= 1:3.1.2 is needed by (installed) 
eclipse-cdt-3.0.2-1jpp_2fc.i386
         eclipse-platform < 1:3.1.3 is needed by (installed) 
eclipse-cdt-3.0.2-1jpp_2fc.i386


If I'm only going to be programming with eclipse in C/C++/Fortran using 
the CDT, I don't want a *LOT* (235MB!) of Java API documentation as well.

-- 
Orion Poplawski
System Administrator                   303-415-9701 x222
Colorado Research Associates/NWRA      FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder CO 80301   http://www.co-ra.com