[fedora-java] Reporting gcj bugs

[Mario Torre]

Il giorno dom, 17/12/2006 alle 17.43 +0000, Paul ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> Can you bung me over a screenshot or so (off list) to make sure they're
> doing the same as produced using Sun's Java?

Sure, here they are!

http://www.limasoftware.net/neugens/downloads/classpath/test/

1, 2, 3 are from the first program, 1a, 2a from the second.

These are screenshots with gcj. Sorry they are full screen, I did not
had time to cut and paste.

> > > As I say, all three could be down to me...
> > 
> > I remember that we had an issue about repainting, but now I really can't look at this, maybe
> > in gcc/classpath bugzilla there is something, but at least with this simple case,
> > it works for me (I know these are the scary words for bug reporters :).
> 
> /me runs away screaming!
> 
> > Can you try to give us some more details (gcc version, ecj version, fedora/redhat version,
> > processor type and other test case etc..)?
> 
> FC rawhide
> x86_64
> ecj is not installed
> gcc 4.1.1 20061213 (Red Hat 4.1.1-47)

I fear I cannot be of any help so, unless I manage to reproduce this
bug.

You said you have submitted one in bugzilla. Can you point me to the
issue number? 

Mario
-- 
Lima Software, SO.PR.IND. s.r.l.
http://www.limasoftware.net/
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/

Please, support open standards:
http://opendocumentfellowship.org/petition/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio
	firmata digitalmente
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/attachments/20061218/a116fbd7/attachment.bin