[fedora-java] sinjdoc vs gjdoc

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

I am happy to see sinjdoc in Fedora rawhide. And I used that package to
create a generic version of the classpath docs:
http://developer.classpath.org/sinjdoc/
But as you can see it is not as nicely looking (imho of course) as the
old gjdoc version: http://developer.classpath.org/doc/
Also it doesn't seem to do highlighted source code linking, a feature I
really like in gjdoc.

So for non-generic/1.5 code I would like to have gjdoc still around, but
is seems sinjdoc actually replaces gjdoc. Does it have to?

Thanks,

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/attachments/20070406/b7e62456/attachment.bin