[fedora-java] sinjdoc vs gjdoc
Andrew Haley
aph at redhat.com
Fri Apr 6 10:14:43 UTC 2007
Mark Wielaard writes:
> I am happy to see sinjdoc in Fedora rawhide. And I used that package to
> create a generic version of the classpath docs:
> http://developer.classpath.org/sinjdoc/
> But as you can see it is not as nicely looking (imho of course) as the
> old gjdoc version: http://developer.classpath.org/doc/
> Also it doesn't seem to do highlighted source code linking, a feature I
> really like in gjdoc.
>
> So for non-generic/1.5 code I would like to have gjdoc still around, but
> is seems sinjdoc actually replaces gjdoc. Does it have to?
I think so. If I didn't like the look of sinjdoc ouput I'd write a
patch for it.
Andrew.
--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
More information about the java-devel
mailing list