[fedora-java] sinjdoc vs gjdoc

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Fri Apr 6 10:14:43 UTC 2007


Mark Wielaard writes:

 > I am happy to see sinjdoc in Fedora rawhide. And I used that package to
 > create a generic version of the classpath docs:
 > http://developer.classpath.org/sinjdoc/
 > But as you can see it is not as nicely looking (imho of course) as the
 > old gjdoc version: http://developer.classpath.org/doc/
 > Also it doesn't seem to do highlighted source code linking, a feature I
 > really like in gjdoc.
 > 
 > So for non-generic/1.5 code I would like to have gjdoc still around, but
 > is seems sinjdoc actually replaces gjdoc. Does it have to?

I think so.  If I didn't like the look of sinjdoc ouput I'd write a
patch for it.

Andrew.

-- 
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903




More information about the java-devel mailing list