[fedora-java] sinjdoc vs gjdoc

[Andrew Haley]

Mark Wielaard writes:
 > On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 11:14 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > Mark Wielaard writes:
 > >  > So for non-generic/1.5 code I would like to have gjdoc still around, but
 > >  > is seems sinjdoc actually replaces gjdoc. Does it have to?
 > > 
 > > I think so.  If I didn't like the look of sinjdoc ouput I'd write a
 > > patch for it.
 > 
 > Sure, I assume you are fine with the default look of the sinjdoc output
 > then. But it isn't just the look, sinjdoc doesn't support a couple of
 > features from gjdoc, like the -linksource, -licensetext, -validhtml,
 > @Link support in comments, etc. So it isn't just a trivial patchlet to
 > get all the things back.

Well let's fix it then.  Continuing to maintain gjdoc is not a plan.

Andrew.

-- 
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903