[fedora-java] Eclipse/Comps

[Alexander Kurtakov]

Mat Booth wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> wrote:
>   
>>> Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group [2]
>>> is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group?
>>>       
>> Yeah, we should update it.  Let's discuss potential patches here.
>>
>>     
>
> We should at least include all the IDE plugins in the "Fedora Eclipse"
> group as optionals to make them 'discoverable,' as it were:
>
> eclipse-birt
> eclipse-dtp
>   
I don't like the idea of putting birt and dtp until they are fully 
builded.  These packages contain only a small part of birt and dtp (as 
needed by valgrind) and until they are fully functional , including them 
will cause only confusion in users - I installed eclipse-birt but birt 
is not available. Let them be pulled by dependencies only when needed.  
If we decide to add eclipse-valgrind (soon to enter rawhide) to the list 
this wouldn't matter because it requires them.
> eclipse-egit
> eclipse-epic
> eclipse-photran
> eclipse-phpeclipse
> eclipse-quickrex
> eclipse-shelled
> eclipse-slide
>   
To the previous I would add:
eclipse-cmake
eclipse-moreunit
eclipse-rpmstubby


Best regards,
Alexander Kurtakov