[fedora-java] bsf-jython

[Christoph Höger]

Am Dienstag, den 08.09.2009, 08:26 -0400 schrieb Andrew Overholt:
> Hi,
> 
> * Christoph Höger <choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de> [2009-09-07 07:41]:
> > 
> > It looks to me as if rebuilding bsf with version 2.4.0 and including a
> > build requires on jython would be enough.
> 
> Sounds fine to me.  Does anything strictly need bsf < 2.4.0?  I realize
> nothing will have a strict Requires <= but we should at least try to
> build the direct packages that need bsf to verify that they still build
> with 2.4.0.

So I will proceed by building bsf 2.4.0 for f11, ok? I just don't know
if I should just rebuild any packages that depend on bsf ... Is there a
way to inform the maintainers?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/attachments/20090908/f0332dde/attachment.bin