[fedora-java] Secondary review of a Java package

[Andrew Haley]

On 08/10/2010 11:10 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
>>
>> The sensible rule everyone seems to use is that if adding gcj support
>> doesn't require much effort, add it.  If not, don't.
>
> As gcj is at 1.5 JVM level there is no point in having gcj support for
> packages that require Java 1.6.

Yes, obviously.  I don't quite understand the point you're making,
though: clearly if a package requires 1.6 then adding gcj support
requires much effort, so don't add it.

Andrew.