[fedora-java] Secondary review of a Java package

[Andrew Haley]

On 08/10/2010 08:25 PM, Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> Dr Andrew John Hughes:
>> Warnings or errors?  gcj uses ecj under the hood, which is more
>> verbose by default
> 
> Warnings.  Indeed, mostly about generics, and some odd unused
> variables.  If it is safe to ignore them, I could do that.
> 
> I don't loose anything else in using the GCJ rather than OpenJDK
> compiler?  Does the quality of the code produced differ in any
> relevant way, or so?

No, it won't make any difference to OpenJDK users.  All you'd be doing
is helping those who use gcj.

Andrew.