[java-sig-commits] [Bug 826551] New: Allow to override the default JETTY_PORT jetty.conf

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed May 30 13:44:18 UTC 2012


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826551

            Bug ID: 826551
        QA Contact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
          Severity: unspecified
           Version: 16
          Priority: unspecified
                CC: java-sig-commits at lists.fedoraproject.org,
                    kdaniel at redhat.com, mizdebsk at redhat.com,
                    overholt at gmail.com, sochotni at redhat.com
          Assignee: sochotni at redhat.com
           Summary: Allow to override the default JETTY_PORT jetty.conf
        Regression: ---
      Story Points: ---
    Classification: Fedora
                OS: Unspecified
          Reporter: kwizart at gmail.com
              Type: Bug
     Documentation: ---
          Hardware: Unspecified
        Mount Type: ---
            Status: NEW
         Component: jetty
           Product: Fedora

Created attachment 587736
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=587736&action=edit
Allow to override JETTY_PORT in /etc/jetty/jetty.conf

Description of problem:
The jetty doc allow to override the default port from which jetty is running.
/etc/jetty/jetty.conf file could be sourced to set an alternative JETTY_PORT.
Unfortunately the initscript doesn't pass the information to the at launch
step.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
jetty for f16

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. echo "JETTY_PORT=8082" >> /etc/jetty/jetty.conf
2. service jetty restart
3. netstat -an |grep 808

Actual results:
netstat -na |grep 808 should report the default 8088 port been used

Expected results:
netstat -na |grep 808 should report the 8082 port used by jetty.

Additional info:
Given that initscript are deprecated in current fedora, this patch explicitely
intend to be usefull on EL6 EPEL port of jetty

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the java-sig-commits mailing list