How is KDE4.2 looking ?

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Armin Moradi <feng.shaun at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Armin <feng.shaun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 21:26:54 Neal Becker wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday 06 January 2009, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>>> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Linuxguy123 <linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > I've been gone for a couple weeks.  How is KDE4.2 looking ?  What
>>>> > > works, what doesn't work ?   Is there a target Fedora release date ?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thanks
>>>> >
>>>> > Kmail still sucks.
>>>>
>>>> ? I use kmail all day every day.  What's the problem?
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> fedora-kde mailing list
>>>> fedora-kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
>>>
>>> I do too, and I don't see any problem either!
>>
>>
>> When I use Kmail, I always get the filling that I am a few clicks away
>> from corrupting a bunch of email.
>>
>> --
>> Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
>> ( www.pembo13.com )
>> _______________________________________________
>> fedora-kde mailing list
>> fedora-kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
>>
>
> LOL you just said you "feel," then what does it have to do with KMail?


Well, it didn't help that the first night I setup KMail on KDE 3.5 it
would show my mail listings, but not show me the actual email. And
gave no errors. But in all fairness, there are no specific issues,
just if there were I would bug them.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )