Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?

Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu
Fri Jan 16 14:37:55 UTC 2009


Linuxguy123 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 11:15 +0000, Anne Wilson wrote:
>> On Friday 16 January 2009 09:58:16 Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Eelko Berkenpies wrote:
>>>> And the same for ATI (I have a 9200SE as an alternative at
>>>> work), they haven't been updating their legacy drivers since 2006.
>>> Just use the Free (as in speech) drivers for that one, they work perfectly
>>> with my 9200SE.
>>>
>> And if you still have problems, try the fix at http://userbase.kde.org/GPU-
>> Performance#Desktop_Effects_causes_random_freezes
>>
>> A number of people have found that it fixes their problems.
> 
> More hacking around.  Linux is supposed to be a mainstream, user ready
> product.   How do we justify asking people to know things about their
> video cards to get it to work properly. 
> 
> I still say that even if the nVidia cards had issues the KDE community
> could have developed an app to help people tune their cards.  Its 2009
> people.  Users shouldn't have to go hand editing xorg.conf files !

Agreed.  No one is arguing that point.

The point of contention is that most folks here assert
fedora/kde isn't the place for this to happen.
*NVIDIA* is where things should "just work", it's their driver, they 
should fix it.

Seriously, are you (or anyone else in the same boat) spending even half 
as much energy engaging NVIDIA to fix this?  (I'd bet $$ answer is no).

If not, why not?  That's what I don't understand.

-- Rex



More information about the kde mailing list