soprano-backend-sesame2

[Patrick Boutilier]

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:33 +0000, José Matos wrote:
>> On Thursday 05 March 2009 01:58:40 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> I don't question any of that, in fact it's clear to me that I won't be
>>> testing the thing myself, but I think my original point is being missed,
>>> to wit: would it not have been useful to include a brief summary of what
>>> the package is about so those of use who are not interested can know
>>> we're not interested?
>> Some (if not all) of those issues have been discussed on this list since the 
>> beginning of kde-4.2.0 testing although the resulting explanation was not as 
>> detailed as it happened on this thread.
> 
> The very first reference I can find to either soprano or sesame on this
> list is Rex's message. Perhaps you can point out some earlier discussion
> here?


I believe he meant in general. Not specifically about this package.
















> 
>> So why should the same explanation be repeated over and over?
> 
> Because it hasn't been said before?
> 
>> If you are questioning the methodology (as it seems you are :-) )
> 
> If you think that, you haven't been paying attention. Go back and read
> my original message on this.
> 
>> the answer is that this is not usually a problem. When someone ask for further details 
>> those details are given as this thread proves. :-)
> 
> I *know* I can ask, I *know* I can Google, I *know* I can use "yum
> info". All I'm trying to say is that all this exchange could have been
> avoided by 2 seconds thought before making the original announcement. I
> wasn't even lambasting Rex particularly, just using his post as an
> example. As my original message said, this is something that happens
> elsewhere as well and I was making a general point.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> poc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fedora-kde mailing list
> fedora-kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: boutilpj.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 297 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090305/b1b9cea9/attachment.vcf