nfs mount problem

[Anne Wilson]

On Wednesday 28 April 2010 08:40:47 Rainer Traut wrote:
> Am 27.04.2010 20:13, schrieb Anne Wilson:
> > That's worrying.  I'm pretty sure CentOS doesn't support NFS4 - RHEL may
> > do in the release that came out only a week or two ago, but didn't
> > before that.  I would think that the server will have to support the
> > same protocol as the client is using, for it to work?
> 
> Hi Anne,
> 
> Centos5 (as well as RHEL5) do support NFSv4.
> And I think C4 and RHEL4 do so too, invented in a later Update.
> 
I've only been using nfs mounts for a year or so, so know very little about 
the subject.  My first effort was to set up nfs4 and I was told that it 
wouldn't work, so I should use nfs3, which, AIUI, is what I currently have.

Prior to that I used samba mounts, since the same mounts worked for both the 
Linux connections and the Windows ones.  When I no longer needed the Windows 
connection I thought I should change.  I guess samba will have moved on, too, 
in the interval :-(

Anne
-- 
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100428/f04cdf99/attachment.bin