KMail is horrifically slow?
Anne Wilson
cannewilson at googlemail.com
Wed Jan 6 17:44:04 UTC 2010
On Wednesday 06 January 2010 16:55:17 Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > ...remains idle for the remainder of the session.
>
> I should add that I have quite a lot of files archived in Documents and
> that initially, it must have taken Nepomuk, oh, say... maybe an hour or
> more to index it all, but since then, all is very well. The nepomuk
> database is around .5 GB (I totally deleted it and allowed it to be
> recreated a couple of days ago, so there is definitely no old garbage).
>
I haven't checked the size of the database, but in general I'd agree with you.
It took quite a while at first, but seems to just do a quick burst now and
then. Except, that is, when I'm sending a message from KMail, when it appears
to take up around 50% CPU.
> I definitely have no suggestions or ideas, but, äähhh... do you have
> virtuoso installed?
>
> I have these, in case it is significant (I don't know which ones are
> actually required):
>
> virtuoso-opensource-5.0.12-1.fc12.x86_64
> virtuoso-opensource-apps-5.0.12-1.fc12.x86_64
> virtuoso-opensource-utils-5.0.12-1.fc12.x86_64
>
I have virtuoso-opensource-5.0.12-1.fc12.i686
Anne
--
KDE Community Working Group
New to KDE Software? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100106/029cbbc3/attachment.bin
More information about the kde
mailing list