kdepim (again. sorry.)

Anoop anoop.chargotra at gmail.com
Thu Jul 15 14:27:22 UTC 2010


On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:

> On 07/15/2010 06:05 AM, Anoop wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu
> > <mailto:rdieter at math.unl.edu>> wrote:
> >
> >     Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> >
> >      > I lost track in the kdepim discussions.
> >      > Is is possible to try the akonadi based kmail(2?) or not.
> >
> >     Not, kdepim-4.5-beta1 as available now was deemed of unstable/alpha
> >     quality
> >     by upstream, so we've chosen not to make it available (yet).
> >
> >     In a similar vein, in this week's kde-sig meeting, we discussed
> >     whether to
> >     plan on including kdepim-4.5 or not in f14, and based on some
> upstream
> >     feedback again, am currently leaning toward not.  We plan on
> >     re-evaluating
> >     this in next week's meeting.
> >
> > Is it possible to put those packages in some private repo, from where
> > people like me can use them?
>
> If you insist, if something breaks, you get to keep the pieces. :)  I'll
> keep these for at least a little while:
>
> http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/RPMS.build/kdepim-4.5-beta1/

Thanks a lot Rex!!!
You can't imagine how badly I have waited for this, ever since KDE-4.0 was
released :). And I not sure how long I have to wait for stable version ;).

Thanks a lot again.
Anoop


> -- Rex
> _______________________________________________
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100715/e7ac71be/attachment.html 


More information about the kde mailing list