kdepim (again. sorry.)
Anoop
anoop.chargotra at gmail.com
Thu Jul 15 14:27:22 UTC 2010
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> On 07/15/2010 06:05 AM, Anoop wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu
> > <mailto:rdieter at math.unl.edu>> wrote:
> >
> > Rolf Offermanns wrote:
> >
> > > I lost track in the kdepim discussions.
> > > Is is possible to try the akonadi based kmail(2?) or not.
> >
> > Not, kdepim-4.5-beta1 as available now was deemed of unstable/alpha
> > quality
> > by upstream, so we've chosen not to make it available (yet).
> >
> > In a similar vein, in this week's kde-sig meeting, we discussed
> > whether to
> > plan on including kdepim-4.5 or not in f14, and based on some
> upstream
> > feedback again, am currently leaning toward not. We plan on
> > re-evaluating
> > this in next week's meeting.
> >
> > Is it possible to put those packages in some private repo, from where
> > people like me can use them?
>
> If you insist, if something breaks, you get to keep the pieces. :) I'll
> keep these for at least a little while:
>
> http://kdeforge.unl.edu/apt/kde-redhat/RPMS.build/kdepim-4.5-beta1/
Thanks a lot Rex!!!
You can't imagine how badly I have waited for this, ever since KDE-4.0 was
released :). And I not sure how long I have to wait for stable version ;).
Thanks a lot again.
Anoop
> -- Rex
> _______________________________________________
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100715/e7ac71be/attachment.html
More information about the kde
mailing list