[Fedora-spins] [spin-kickstarts] +nm-applet

[Anoop]

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Rahul shared some of the same concern that Kevin did about this recent
> change I made.
>
> I have to admit, I share some of the same pragmatic sentiments that
> Rahul does (esp in areas where stability/features are even wider, like
> with kpackagekit).
>
> Comments?
I am using NM plasmoid and so for it has worked wonderfully well for
me. I use mobile, wireless and Wired connections with different
profiles.

Thanks,
Anoop

>
> -- Rex
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] [spin-kickstarts] +nm-applet
> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:33:52 +0530
> From: Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com>
> To: The Spin Special Interest Group mailing list
> <spins at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> CC: Rex Dieter <rdieter at fedoraproject.org>
>
> On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> +# provide nm-applet as fallback in cases where knm/nm-plasmoid fails
>> +NetworkManager-gnome
>>
>
> I assume this requires manual reconfiguration by the user.  Couldn't knm
> or nm-plasmoid whichever one is the future for KDE just be fixed to
> support everything nm-applet does?  If you don't have feature parity,
> you should just bite the bullet and continue to include nm-applet by
> default and ignore the purity angle.   Including both is not the right
> approach IMO.
>
> Rahul
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
>