Possible (qt-)webkit problem?

[Eelko Berkenpies]

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Eelko Berkenpies
<e.berkenpies at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering, could someone test the URL nu.nl or tweakers.net in any
> WebKit driven browser (rekonq / arora / konqueror)? Both of those URL's seem
> to crash any of those 3 browsers for me.
>
> Fedora 13 / KDE 4.4.80 and following Qt components here;
>
> qt.i686 - 1:4.7.0-0.13.beta1.fc13.jit - @kde-unstable
> qt-assistant-adp.i686 - 4.6.2-1.fc13 - @kde-unstable
> qt-devel.i686 - 1:4.7.0-0.13.beta1.fc13.jit - @kde-unstable
> qt-mysql.i686- 1:4.7.0-0.13.beta1.fc13.jit - @kde-unstable
> qt-sqlite.i686 - 1:4.7.0-0.13.beta1.fc13.jit - @kde-unstable
> qt-webkit.i686 - 1:4.7.0-0.13.beta1.fc13.jit - @kde-unstable
> qt-webkit-devel.i686 - 1:4.7.0-0.13.beta1.fc13.jit - @kde-unstable
> qt-x11.i686 - 1:4.7.0-0.13.beta1.fc13.jit - @kde-unstable
> qtscriptbindings.i686 - 0.1.0-10.fc13 -
> @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201005122002.i386
> webkitpart.i686 - 0.0.5-0.2.svn1088283.fc13 -
> @anaconda-InstallationRepo-201005122002.i386
>
> A post I made earlier to the upstream rekonq list suggested that Qt 4.7.0b1
> holds an older version of webkit (
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/2010-May/001378.html ) and that
> upgrading could possibly help. I'd like things to be confirmed first before
> I start fooling around though. ;-) =)
>
> --
> Eelko Berkenpies
>

Nevermind, I found it. Turns out to be Flash (I was using the 10.1
pre-release).

--
Eelko Berkenpies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20100527/f631428d/attachment.html