KDE PIM 4.6 QA wiki page Was: KDE-SIG meeting report (03/2011)

[Jaroslav Reznik]

Ok
I can see a lot of input here - could you put it to this wiki page? [1] Then we 
can track it and decide based on your input.

Thanks
Jaroslav

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/F15Features/KDEPIM46QA

On Thursday, January 20, 2011 09:43:13 am moabi2000 wrote:
> Does Kmail2 still more than double the diskspace used if you have
> local maildirs? (see https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249987)
> 
> I run on a small SSD and space is at a premium. When I tested kmail 2
> it took my 15Gb of mail and with the akonadi cache and the nepomuk
> index ended up using more than 32Gb. That's 25% of my drive space,
> which I can't justify. Its great that kmail2 doesn't touch existing
> mail to avoid risks of corruption etc, but I can't test kmail2 until
> there is an option to not cache ALL the mail store. I presume there
> are other users in this category.
> 
>  At the moment I am back to using Gnus - migration was a pain due to
> kmail's non-standard maildirs, but now working great.
> 
> Cheers
> M.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 19, 2011 13:08:15 Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >> > keep kdepim-4.6 or revert to kdepim-4.4
> >> > 
> >> > * user reports
> >> > ** rdieter report success using kmail 4.6 with his 100 mb GMail
> >> > mailbox ** dgilmore testing against ~100gb imap mail: (mostly) fail,
> >> > initial sync of data resulted in akonadi crash, and pegging cpu for
> >> > quite awhile ** jreznik reports - importing new email ok, actually
> >> > very good, after restart Akonadi and Nepomuk eating 100% cpu
> >> > ** than reports several crashes
> >> > ** we need more users testing!
> >> 
> >> To be clear, we're mostly interested in testing/feedback of the lastest
> >> builds, kdepim-4.5.94.1 (or newer).
> >> 
> >> (We are already aware of much badness with previous 4.6 pre-release
> >> builds).
> > 
> > I'm always using the latest with hope that it will become much better. I
> > agree there was much more badness in previous 4.6 pre-release builds,
> > but from my pov the progress made is still not sufficient.
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde mailing list
> > kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> > New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kde mailing list
> kde at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org

-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/