kde-4.13.x for f20, include optional nepomuk support or not?

[Dan Mossor]

On 06/24/2014 05:00 AM, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:
> Dne 23.6.2014 18:11, Rex Dieter napsal(a):
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/22/2014 07:20 PM, Markus Slopianka wrote:
>>>> Hi.
>>>> Not sure why it seems to happen with every update but once again
>>>> kde-workspace 4.11.10 tries to install Nepomuk. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything we can do to help fix this?
>>>
>>> it's just that the nepomuk-free kde-workspace build from kde-unstable
>>> got superceded by a recent update:
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-7457/kde-workspace-4.11.10-2.fc20 
>>>
>>>
>>> We have concrete plans to start work on brining kde-4.13.x to f20
>>> officially, but I guess we haven't decided on how best to deal with the
>>> nepomuk transition yet (ie, whether remove nepomuk-related deps from
>>> core kde packages or not).
>>
>>
>> OK, kde-sig members, please add your opinion this topic ^^.
>>
>> I think I'm of a mind to removing optional nepomuk-related deps when
>> kde-4.13.x lands, since
>> * baloo migrates old nepomuk data
>> * nepomukserver no longer runs, so the related features don't really 
>> work
>> anymore (afaik).
>>
>> -- Rex
>
> +1 remove it
>
Another +1 from me.

-- 
Dan Mossor
Systems Engineer at Large
Fedora QA Team | Fedora KDE SIG | Fedora Server SIG
Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice
FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx
San Antonio, Texas, USA