kqemu inclusion in kernel

[Rahul Sundaram]

dragoran wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Paul Wouters wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>> A much better way to get this stuff into Fedora is to find out why
>>>> it isn't getting upstream, and get involved with whatever cleanup
>>>> work is necessary to get it there.
>>>
>>> Upstream (of which a lot of people are working at RedHat as well, so
>>> telling them to go upstream is kinda moot) often don't even start to
>>> listen. There is no politics in the kernel, because kernel people are
>>> just not enganging in an discussion at all.
>>
>> Who even submitted these patches upstream to start engaging in a 
>> discussion?
>>
> in case of kqemu nobody... seems qemu upstream isn't really interessted 
> in doing this.

So all the harping on about whether Red Hat developers are involved 
upstream or not, kernel politics etc is irrelevant.  Red Hat kernel 
developers wouldn't prefer discussing patches to the kernel here either.

If anyone is really interested in getting Kqemu in the Fedora, encourage 
the Kqemu developer to submit his patches to LKML instead of focusing on 
  getting the Fedora kernel maintainers to patch the kernel.

Rahul