more bug triage fun

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 02:22:11 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 23:37:53 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> 
> > Greetings. 
> > 
> > Finally sat down to look at moving forward on the kernel bug traging
> > stuff (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage )
> > 
> > Some more thoughts: 
> > 
> > Would it be useful to add tracker bugs for [PATCH] bugs? Or is that
> > easy enough to query for if you are looking for them? Should we ask
> > submitters to make sure they also submit upstream?
> > 
> 
> I've been adding Keywords: Patch, but a tracker might be better.

ok. I can make one I guess. ;) 

> That can mean several different things:
> 
> 1) A patch to our kernel.spec file or other fedora-only thing.
> 2) A link to an upstream patch that fixes the bug in our kernel.
> 3) Something meant for upstream.

Would it be useful to note witch it was? (If we can tell). 
I guess easiest might be: 

[PATCH/Fedora]

[PATCH/current]

[PATCH/UPSTREAM]

?

Or too complicated?

> > Should we have any tracker for [RFE] bugs as well? 
> > 
> 
> Probably not worth the trouble.

ok

> > I noticed we have: 
> > 
> > Bug 126342 Meta bug: custom built kernels -
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126342
> > 
> > Should we close any crazy custom kernel config issues as a
> > duplicate of that one?
> > 
> 
> Yes, I think that's what it's for.

Sounds good.

I think I will see about working on the rawhide bugs this week if
possible. I already moved some of the video ones over. 

kevin