f15 2.6.39 rebase
lists at sapience.com
Thu Jun 30 19:49:49 UTC 2011
On 06/30/2011 03:04 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 30 czerwca 2011 20:58 użytkownik Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> napisał:
>> A lot of broken software is assuming version numbers are 2.6.x. We could push a load
>> of userspace packages to fix it, but that's just the stuff we control. 3rd party add-ons
>> would break for no good reason.
>> This deviates from what upstream calls it, but it's just a number, and not breaking
>> existing code in an update is more important here.
> Of course you are absolutely right at this point :)
> Thanks for your answer.
>> For f16 of course, we'll make
>> the 3.0 transition, because moving to a new release has differing expectations,
>> and by the time it ships, hopefully everything that cares will be fixed.
For what its worth - so far - running 3.0 on F15 I did need procps &
mdadm updated - otherwise I've not seen too many issues that I know about.
What else do you think might be breaking / broken / grumpy ?
More information about the kernel