Proposal to add build of kernel-backports package to kernel.spec

John W. Linville linville at redhat.com
Thu Oct 6 16:21:11 UTC 2011


On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 12:08:27PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 12:00:42PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>  
>  > Hardware enablement is an endless treadmill.  As Fedora has matured,
>  > the delta between current Fedora kernels and current upstream kernels
>  > has tended to widen (at least for older releases e.g. F14).
> 
> Right, but we're moving away from that, and trying to get back to the
> older model where we ship at least the current-1 release.
> (But not for 14, because it's such a quantum leap).
> 
> Are you proposing this for _just_ 14  ? In which case, I'd be fine with
> that, because we're not rebasing it.
> 
> For 15 onwards, I don't think this is worth it.

Until 3.1 is released, F14 is the only release that can use it anyway.
That said, I would like to use it there if nothing else.

As for F15 and beyond, current-1 can still be enough delta to cause
problems.  Also, obstacles against updating kernel releases can be
unpredictable.

Maybe we could have it in the .spec file for all the releases, but have
it turned-off by default?  Then at least it is there if we need it.

Using compat-wireless is a good way to make even more up-to-date
hardware support available in Fedora at nearly no cost to us.  I would
really like to see us take advantage of it.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		The water won't run clean until you get
linville at redhat.com			the pigs out of the creek.


More information about the kernel mailing list