[PATCH] Add patch to let watchdog and perf work on Pentium4s (rhbz 713675)
Dave Jones
davej at redhat.com
Wed Oct 19 20:32:07 UTC 2011
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:43:44PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Not sure what the patch prefence is for the mailing list. This patch applies
> to the fedpkg kernel git tree. Better changelog below.
>
> Waiting on test feedback.
Patch looks ok. The bug is against f15, but I'm assuming we want this
on all branches. (And amusingly, f15 gets the most rejects..)
(16:24:26:davej at adamo:fedora-kernel)$ ./apply.sh f15 perf.diff
patching file kernel.spec
Hunk #1 FAILED at 649.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1240.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel.spec.rej
patching file x86-p4-make-watchdog-and-perf-work-together.patch
(16:24:35:davej at adamo:fedora-kernel)$ ./apply.sh f16 perf.diff
patching file kernel.spec
Hunk #1 FAILED at 649.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1355 with fuzz 2 (offset 115 lines).
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel.spec.rej
patching file x86-p4-make-watchdog-and-perf-work-together.patch
(16:24:39:davej at adamo:fedora-kernel)$ ./apply.sh master perf.diff
patching file kernel.spec
Hunk #1 FAILED at 649.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1347 with fuzz 2 (offset 107 lines).
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file kernel.spec.rej
patching file x86-p4-make-watchdog-and-perf-work-together.patch
the spec rejects are pretty trivial of course, but do you want to just
create a fedora account, for committing stuff like this ?
Backports are usually non-controversial.
Dave
More information about the kernel
mailing list