Patch reason tracking
Adam Jackson
ajax at redhat.com
Wed Nov 20 17:08:47 UTC 2013
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 21:40 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Every month I'm trying to publish a Fedora Kernel patch report that
> lists all of our patches and why we are carrying them. Thankfully,
> the past couple of times I've done this it's been pretty clear that
> for the most part we're just carrying fixes queued up to head to Linus
> soon.
>
> However, it also means I have to track down the status of that patch
> every month. I've been trying to keep PatchList.txt up to date, but
> that isn't scaling very well as it's easy for people to forget to add
> patches to it or remove them when we drop the patch. To help this
> tracking, I'd like to push the status information into each patch
> itself. What I propose is basically to fields at the top of each
> patch:
>
> Bugzilla:
> Upstream-status:
>
> The first is fairly self-evident. It just list the Red Hat Bugzilla
> number associated with the patch. If there isn't one, just put N/A.
Only question I have is why/whether this needs to be rhbz, or if we
could just do arbitrary bz urls. I don't really mind either way though.
- ajax
More information about the kernel
mailing list